Criminalising free speech

To suggest that the Palestinians, Lebanese, Iraqis or Afghans have the right to resist occupation and aggression through armed struggle could easily be construed as public provocation to terrorism. Advocates of direct action against corporations, government policies and intergovernmental organisations like the EU may also fall foul of the new laws. >>>>>

Gangsters Now Demanding that Europe pay 440 Billion dollars to Bailout Continent

What the hell is going on here?

Since the Federal Reserve and the US Treasury Department have made it clear that they will be bailing out European banks, why is more money needed for this scheme?

Will US banks and those on the continent engage in some type of complex scheme, where their books show “illiquid” assets to be bought by the US, then have those transferred to Europe, so they will collect twice on this blackmail scheme?

The Western world is rife with the most unjust and poorest (pun intended) fundamental economic policy (relying on interest/usury).  Those enemies of Islam, have duped their own country folk into letting them cash out on something more than the abusive system these very same countrymen live under.  This level of oppression continues to rock the Western World, while the payment of blood, natural resources and sovereignty is paid by Muslim people(s).

Don’t be soft on Islam, says EU terror chief

De Kerchove’s statement comes against a background of infighting within the EU over counter-terrorism policy. The European Commission has been working for several years on a paper analysing militancy in Europe and outlining policy to combat radicalisation. The Council of Ministers is still waiting for the now long-overdue paper, on which future policy will be based.

EU officials claimed last week the delay was because Jacques Barrot, the French Commissioner for justice, freedom and security, had grave reservations about the definition of terrorism in the commission’s policy paper and had delayed signing the policy document as it ‘went too far in blaming Muslim communities’.  >>>>>

He should not be in office.  This attack on Islam for job security, or worse yet, mere hatred shows that he has not done his homework on Islam or terrorism for that matter.  While no doubt Muslims have gone astray, so have Christians, Jews and those who believe or disbelieve otherwise.

However, it still remains that the West went into an illegal war against Iraq; and continues to be in denial with Afghanistan; while at the same time preparing war(s) against other Muslim nation(s), with the support of many European countries. If he took an approach to deal with actual and valid cases of terrorism, this would be more credible.

He hasn’t.  He stands for something more sinister and buys into the conspiracy theories that the official governments have to offer.  The facts brought about by independent parties have become part of the propaganda that contributes to what the government(s) want us to believe are conspiracy theories.

These very same European countries that have a hatred for the immigration that stands to eventually significantly challenge their so-called ‘democracies’ because of the newly formed voting citizens and their potential for population growth in comparison to the ascendants of people who actually chose the non-democratic, barbaric approach when colonizing and exploiting the countries these immigrants came from.

Someone of his political position should be more objective with his assessments and even moreso with his rhetoric.  It doesn’t take much to figure out his other political leanings and alliances with just this one statement.